Allowed

Aman Saini v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC8 Nov 2023BAIL/46164/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court allowed a bail application filed by Aman Saini in a case under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, despite opposition from the State, based on assurances not to tamper with evidence or witnesses.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on personal bond and two sureties subject to conditions not to tamper with evidence or witnesses and to appear on all dates.

Aman Saini Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:214604

¶2

Court No. - 75

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 46164 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Aman Saini Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Lalit Prakash,Suraj Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Sharma,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P. and perused the record.

¶7

The instant bail application has been filed with the prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 074 of 2021, under Section 2/3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Govardhan, District Mathura, during the pendency of the trial.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that according to the gang chart, three cases are shown against the applicant and in the said cases the applicant has been enlarged on bail. The bail orders have been annexed as Annexure No. 3 to the affidavit. It is further contended that the applicant is neither a gang leader nor a member of any gang. The criminal history of the applicant has been explained in para 9 of the affidavit accompanying the petition. The applicant is in jail since 23.02.2021.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record.

¶10

Considering the rival submissions of learned counsel for parties, material available on record as well as in light of the submission of counsel for the applicant to the effect that while on bail in this case, the applicant would not commit any crime/offence nor would try to tamper the evidence or influence the witnesses in any manner, whatsoever it may be, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.

¶11

Let the applicant- Aman Saini involved in the aforesaid case, be

¶12

released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned on the following conditions that:

¶13

(i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; and,

¶14

(iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court.

¶15

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court.

¶16

Order Date :- 8.11.2023 S.Verma

¶17

Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Aman Saini v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aman Saini v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajeev Vs State of U.P.

Ajay Vs State of U.P.

Shamsher Vs State of U.P.

Ramji Singh Vs State of U.P.

Bharat Sonkar Vs State of U.P.

Sohail @ Sahil Vs State of U.P.