Single Judge allowed bail to Mukesh, Jitendra, and Arjun under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in a case involving the U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, noting lack of specific gang definitions in FIR.
Release on bail by personal bond and two sureties each, subject to conditions against tampering evidence and pressuring witnesses.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:216108
Court No. - 74
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 45804 of 2023
Applicant :- Mukesh And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Upendra Kumar Pushkar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
(i) the applicants shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;
(ii) the applicants shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; and,
(iii) the applicants shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court.
Order Date :- 9.11.2023 Lbm/-
Digitally signed by :- LAL BAHADUR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the first applicants are entitled to release on bail in an offence under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Mukesh
Jitendra
Arjun
State of U.P.
Vivek Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
