Court allowed bail to the applicant in a cheating and forgery case after she was confined for over eight months. No reasonable apprehension of tampering was established by the State despite the murder-related circumstances in her husband's death.
Bail granted on personal bond and two sureties subject to conditions of appearance and non-interference.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:230459
Court No. - 75
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 45691 of 2023
Applicant :- Mithlesh Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Pragya Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Sharma,J.
conclusion of trial, more so no reasonable apprehension has been brought to the fore by the State that the applicant, if enlarged on bail, would either temper with the evidence or delay the trial or intimidate the witness, without commenting on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.
(i) shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court; (ii) shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (iii) shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses.
Order Date :- 5.12.2023 S.Verma
Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail after being in custody for over eight months with no reasonable apprehension of tampering with evidence.
Mithlesh Singh
Umesh Chandra Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
