Allowed

Rajendra Patel v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC17 Apr 2023BAIL/4541/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court granted bail in a criminal mystery application. The applicant, Raja Patel, was already on bail in similar cases and undertook to comply with conditions. The High Court found it a fit case for bail without commenting on the merits.

What did the court decide?

Release of the applicant on bail with personal bond and two sureties under Section 3(1) of U.P. Gangster & Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act.

Rajendra Patel Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Court No. - 86

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4541 of 2023

¶3

Applicant :- Rajendra Patel Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rakesh Chandra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶6

The submission of the learned counsel for the applicant is that the accused applicant is in jail since 03.07.2022. In the gang chart two cases have been shown against the accused applicant and in all case the accused applicant has already been released on bail and the bail orders are annexed as Annexure no. 5 collectively alongwith cases shown as criminal history against the applicant that has been explained in para 14 of the affidavit filed in support of the bail application. Further submission is that accused applicant is prepared to furnish sureties and bonds and there is no possibility of his either fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the evidence. Applicant undertakes that he will not misuse the liberty of bail, if granted and cooperate in trial.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer of bail. He has however not disputed the aforesaid facts.

¶8

Upon hearing the submissions made by learned counsel of both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting on the merits of the case, I find it to be a fit case for bail.

¶9

Let applicant Rajendra Patel be released on bail in Case Crime No. 169 of 2022, under Section 3(1) U.P. Gangster & Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, P.S. Obra, District Sonebhadra, on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-

¶10

(i) The applicant will not tamper with prosecution evidence and will not harm or harass the victim/complainant in any manner whatsoever.

¶11

(ii) The applicant will abide the orders of court, will attend the court on every date and will not delay the disposal of trial in any manner whatsoever.

¶12

(iii) The applicant will not indulge in any unlawful activities.

¶13

(iv) The applicant will not misuse the liberty of bail in any manner whatsoever.

¶14

The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by court concerned and in case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, court concerned will be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison.

¶15

Order Date :- 17.4.2023

¶16

Bhanu

¶17

Digitally signed by :- BHANU PRATAP KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Rajendra Patel v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajendra Patel v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mushtaque Alam Vs State of U.P.

Sagar Dom Vs State of U.P.

Amit Solanki Vs State of U.P.

Rajeev Kumar Gupta Vs State of U.P.

Man Singh @ Raja Vs State of U.P.

Sonu Vs State of U.P.