Allowed

Imran v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC27 Oct 2023BAIL/45033/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a second bail application by Imran charged under Sections 376, 313, 504, and 506 IPC. The court noted the first application was rejected but observed that time had passed, the trial had commenced, and no material indicated a risk of tampering with evidence.

What did the court decide?

The applicant was released on bail under Sections 376, 313, 504, 506 IPC on furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties.

Imran Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:204999

¶2

Court No. - 68

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 45033 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Imran Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Brij Lal Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶6

This is second bail application moved on behalf of the applicant. The first Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.2031 of 2023 has been rejected by this Court, vide order dated 13.02.2023.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the State and perused the material on record.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present. He further submits that by the efflux of time, the trial began, in which, the statement of victim was recorded as P.W.1, wherein she has categorically stated on 27.08.2022 neither she went to the house of the applicant nor the applicant has committed rape with her as well as nor the applicant has threatened to kill her, copy of which is annexed as Annexure-7 to the affidavit accompanying the bail application. It is thus contended that the victim has not supported the prosecution version, therefore the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He thus submits that no offence against the applicant is made out. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused have also been mentioned. It has also been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required and is also ready to accept all the conditions which the Court may deem fit to impose upon him. He next submits that applicant is languishing in jail since 06.10.2022

¶9

having no criminal history.

¶10

Per contra, learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail.

¶11

After perusing the record in the light of the submissions made at the bar and after taking an overall view of all the facts and circumstances of this case, the nature of evidence and also the absence of any convincing material to indicate the possibility of tampering with the evidence, this Court is of the view that the applicant may be enlarged on bail.

¶12

Let the applicant- Imran , be released on bail in Case Crime No. 620 of 2022 under Sections 376, 313, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Lisari Gate, District Meerut, on furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:-

¶13

i) The applicant will not tamper with prosecution evidence and will not harm or harass the victim/complainant in any manner whatsoever.

¶14

ii) The applicant will abide the orders of court, will attend the court on every date and will not delay the disposal of trial in any manner whatsoever.

¶15

(iii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the date fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶16

(iv) The applicant will not misuse the liberty of bail in any manner whatsoever. In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under section 82 Cr.P.C., may be issued and if applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under section 174-A I.P.C.

¶17

(V) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on dates fixed for (1) opening of the case, (2) framing of charge and (3) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law

¶18

and the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229A IPC.

¶19

(vi) The trial court may make all possible efforts/endeavour and try to conclude the trial expeditiously after the release of the applicant.

¶20

The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by court concerned and in case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, court concerned will be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison.

¶21

The bail application is allowed.

¶22

Order Date :- 27.10.2023 S.Ali

¶23

Digitally signed by :- SHAUKAT ALI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Imran v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Imran v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Subash Patel Vs State of U.P.

Rajesh Kushwaha Vs State of U.P. and Another

Sarvez Vs State of U.P.

Anil Gupta Vs State of U.P.

Kala @ Janki Vs State of U.P.

Jafar Shekh Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others