This is a bail application where the applicant alleged false implication. The High Court, without opining on merits, allowed bail with conditions including furnishing a bond with sureties and abiding by court orders.
Bail granted on furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in a sum to be fixed by the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 86
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4498 of 2023
Applicant :- Anil Kumar Gautam Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajeev Kumar Singh Parmar,Anupam Laloriya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Mithilesh Kumar, Shri D.P.S. Chauhan, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State and perused the record.
It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. It is next contended that a concocted and false story has been set up by the prosecution against the applicant whereas the applicant has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. It is further submitted that nothing incriminating has been recovered from the possession of the applicant. It is further submitted that the alleged recovery that has been shown against the applicant is planted one. It is further submitted that applicant is running a company in the name of GDIGI India Software Solution and also having CSC Certificate and ID and also having valid TEN Number obtained by the Income Tax Department and applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that ingredients of offences are absent and entire prosecution story is based on false and frivolous allegations. It is further submitted that trial is not likely to be concluded in near future. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required. It has also been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 27.08.2022 and he has no criminal history.
Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and has submits that prima facie offence against the accused applicant is made out and in case applicant is release on bail, he will misuse
the liberty of bail, but, he could not disputed the aforesaid facts.
Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused, looking to the delay in conclusion of trial, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and the law laid down by the Apex Court in Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. C.B.I. & Another, passed in S.L.P.(Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021 , the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant Anil Kumar Gautam involved in Case Crime No. 606 of 2022, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B I.P.C. and section 66C, 66D I.T. Act, and section 36/42 Aadhaar Act, 2016, Police Station Barra , District Kanpur Nagar be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions.
(i) The applicant will not tamper with prosecution evidence and will not harm or harass the victim/complainant in any manner whatsoever.
(ii) The applicant will abide the orders of court, will attend the court on every date and will not delay the disposal of trial in any manner whatsoever.
(iii) The applicant will not indulge in any unlawful activities.
(iv) The applicant will not misuse the liberty of bail in any manner whatsoever.
The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by court concerned and in case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, court concerned will be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison.
Order Date :- 26.4.2023
Bhanu
Digitally signed by :- BHANU PRATAP KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant has made out a prima facie case to be released on bail.
Whether the applicant would abuse the process of law if released on bail.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. C.B.I. & AnotherReferred¶9
Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. C.B.I. & Another, passed in S.L.P.(Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Anil Kumar Gautam
State of U.P.
Vivek Kumar Singh
Bhanu Pratap Kushwaha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
