This judgment grants bail to the applicant in a criminal case involving the U.P. Gangsters Act. The court held that despite opposing submissions, the record supported the applicant's assurance of not interfering with evidence, allowing release on personal bond and sureties.
Released on bail by furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:213454
Court No. - 74
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 44607 of 2023
Applicant :- Intzar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Chandra Nath Bhatt,Laxmi Kant Bhatt Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
(i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;
(ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; and,
(iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court.
Order Date :- 7.11.2023 Lbm/-
Digitally signed by :- LAL BAHADUR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in the pending trial.
Whether the allegations in the FIR vitiate the maintainability of the case.
Whether the applicant would commit further offences or tamper with evidence while on bail.
4 provisions across 2 enactments
Intzar
Vivek Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
