Allowed

Mohammad Umar v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC1 Dec 2023BAIL/44279/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal miscellaneous bail application filed by Mohammad Umar against the State of U.P. The High Court allowed the application, releasing him on bail with specific conditions including appearance before the Court and no tampering with the victim or investigation.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail with stipulations to appear in Court, refrain from victim, and not tamper with investigation.

Mohammad Umar Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:227991

¶2

Court No. - 68

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 44279 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Mohammad Umar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Sachin Malik Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Mohd. Naushad,Noor Ahmed

¶5

Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶6

orZeku nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd eksgEen mej dh vksj ls eq0v0la0 361 lu 2023] vUrxZr /kkjk 363] 366] 376] 323] 109 Hkk0na0fo0 ,oa 5@6] 16@17 ikDlks ,sDV] Fkkuk dSjkuk] ftyk 'kkeyh esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶7

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us iwjd 'kiFki= nkf[ky fd;k] bls i=koyh ij j[kk tk;A

¶8

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶9

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd vkosnd dks bl izdj.k esa xyr ,oa QthZ rjhds ls >wBk QWlk;k x;k gS] mlus dfFkr vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k gS] vkosnd izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa uketn vfHk;qDr ugha gS] ?kVuk dh izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ,d fnu foyEc ls ntZ djk;h x;h gS ftldk dksbZ Li"Vhdj.k ugha fn;k x;k gS] ihfM+rk ds vk/kkj dkMZ esa vafdr tUe frfFk ds vuqlkj og ckfyx gS] ihfM+rk vkosnd ds HkkbZ vCnqy dkfnj ls I;kj djrh Fkh rFkk mlus viuk vk/kkj dkMZ vkosnd ds HkkbZ dks ckfyx gksus ds lEcU?k esa fn[kk;krs gq, 'kknh djus ds fy, dgk Fkk rFkk og vCnqy dkfnj dks viuh dksVZ eSfjt dk jftLVzs’ku djkus ds fy, bykgkckn ys x;h Fkh rFkk ogkW ij mUgksaus fudkg dj fy;k] ihfM+rk vius ?kj ls vdsyh x;h Fkh] vkosnd funksZ"k gS rFkk og bl izdj.k esa fn0 7&8&2023 ls dkjkxkj es a fu:) gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A

¶10

fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ dk izcy fojks/k djrs gq, rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd vkosnd }kjk dkfjr vijk/k laKs; ,oa xEHkhj izd`fr dk gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij u NksM+k tk;A

¶11

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ ds ifjizs{; esa i=koyh ij miyC/k lkjoku rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dk lexz :i ls voyksdu djus ds ckn] lcwrksa dh izd`fr vkSj fdlh Hkh Bksl fojks/kkRed lkexzh dh vuqifLFkfr ,oa miyC/k lkexzh ls NsM+NkM+ dh laHkkouk u gksus ds rF; dks ns[krs gq, esjh jk; esa vkosnd dks tekur ij eqDr djus dk mi;qDr vk/kkj gSA

¶12

vr% okn ds xq.k nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fVIi.kh fd, gq, vkosnd dks mijksDr of.kZr vijk/k esa lacaf/kr U;k;ky; dh lUrqf"V ij O;fDrxr ca/k&i= ,oa vf/kd /kujkf’k ds nks LFkkuh; izfrHkw izLrqr djus ij fuEufyf[kr 'krksZ ds lkFk tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A

¶13

1& vkosnd foospuk ;k ijh{k.k ds nkSjku vfHk;kstu lk{;ksa ds lkFk NsM + NkM+ ugha djsxkA

¶14

2& vkosnd vfHk;kstu lkf{k;ksa o ihfM+r@f’kdk;rdrkZ dks Mjk;sxk@/kedk;sxk ughaA

¶15

3& vkosnd U;k;ky; ds vkns’kksa dk ikyu djsxk] og ijh{k.k ds nkSjku fcuk dksbZ vuko’;d LFkxu

¶16

fy, fu;r frfFk ij U;k;ky; esa mifLFkr gksxk rFkk ijh{k.k esa bZekunkjh ls lg;ksx djsxkA

¶17

4& vkosnd tekur ij fjgk gksus ds ckn tekur dh Lora=rk dk nq:i;ksx ugha djsxk vkSj fdlh Hkh vijkf/kd xfrfof/k esa fyIr ugha gksxk u dksbZ vijkf/kd d`R; djsxkA

¶18

5& vkosnd izR;{k ;k vizR;{k :i ls ekeys ds rF;ksa ls ifjfpr fdlh Hkh O;fDr ;k iqfyl vf/kdkfj;ksa dks dksbZ izyksHku ;k /kedh ugha nsxk u gh muls dksbZ ok;nk djsxk] ftlds dkj.k mUgsa U;k;ky; esa rF;ksa dks mtkxj djus ls fojr jguk iM+sA

¶19

mijksDr 'krksZ esa ls fdlh ds mYya?ku ds ekeys esa] ijh{k.k U;k;ky; vkosnd dh tekur fu;ekuqlkj jn~n djus dks Lora= gSA

fn0 % 1&12&2023

ds0lh0flag

2 of 2

Digitally signed by :- KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Mohammad Umar v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammad Umar v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shanker @ Ghanshyam Vs State of U.P.

Soni Vs State of U.P.

Prempal Vs State of U.P.

Sharafat @ Shararat Vs State of U.P.

Riyaz Ali Alias Vicky Vs State of U.P.

Raju Vs State of U.P.