Allowed

Ifrat v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC28 Oct 2023BAIL/44099/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. filed by Ifrat in a criminal case involving assault, attempted murder, and arms offences was allowed. The court was satisfied that the applicant had made out a fit case, noting injuries were simple in nature and parity with co-accused on bail.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail on personal bond and two sureties subject to appearance in court and not tampering with evidence.

Ifrat Vs State of U.P. — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:206266

¶2

Court No. - 75

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 44099 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Ifrat Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sunil Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Sharma,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶7

The present application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking bail in Case Crime No.0156 of 2023, under Sections 147,148, 149, 323, 307, 504 I.PC., Section 7 U.P. Criminal Law Amendment Act & Sections 3/25/27 Arms Act, Police Station Bahsuma, District Meerut.

¶8

Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the instant case due to malafide intentions. He next submits that as per prosecution story, two rival groups were found involved in brick batting and arsoning by police on 17.9.2023 and in all five persons were injured from defense side and three from prosecution side. It is apparent that the prosecution has not come up with clean hands and it is difficult to ascertain at this stage as to which party is the aggressor. None of the injuries found on the vital part of the injured. All the injuries sustained by the injured are simple in nature. He further submits that similarly placed co-accused Mustkim and Jan Mohammad have already been enlarged on bail by Co-ordinate Benches of this Court, vide orders dated

¶9

16.10.2023 and 19.10.2023 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos.43841 of 2023 and 43521 of 2023, respectively. Copy of the bail orders produced by learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record. Applicant, who is languishing in jail since 17.9.2023, having no criminal history is also entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. There is no likelihood of his abscondence or tampering with the evidence, therefore, the accused-applicant may be enlarged on bail.

¶10

Learned AGA has vehemently opposed the bail application but he could not dispute the submission made above.

¶11

Considering the facts, circumstances and the submissions made above, this Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a fit case for grant of bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed .

¶12

Let the applicant - Ifrat , involved in the aforesaid case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the conditions that he:

¶13

(i) shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court;

¶14

(ii) shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;

¶15

(iii) shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses.

¶16

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court.

¶17

Order Date :- 28.10.2023 Zafar

¶18

Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ZAFAR ANSARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ifrat v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ifrat v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pushpendra Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Rakesh Vs State of Up through principle secretary (home)

Satyam Tiwari @ Kallu Vs State of U.P.

Krishandev Prasad @ Krishan Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Naushad Vs State of U.P.

Haseen Vs State of U.P.