Allowed

Golu @ Vineet Singh v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC27 Apr 2023BAIL/4399/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This criminal miscellaneous bail application was disposed of by granting bail to the applicant, Golu @ Vineet Singh, who was in jail since December 2, 2022, involved in a case under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act.

What did the court decide?

Enlargement of the applicant on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing two heavy sureties, one being a family member, subject to specified conditions.

Golu @ Vineet Singh Vs State of U.P. — Property and Title | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Court No. - 86

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4399 of 2023

¶3

Applicant :- Golu @ Vineet Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Praveen Kumar Singh,Rupesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.

¶5

A copy of supplementary affidavit dated 13.4.2023 has been produced by learned counsel for the applicant, which is taken on record.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Mithilesh Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶7

This is the second bail application moved on behalf of the applicant. The first bail application moved on behalf of the applicant was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 13.10.2022.

¶8

It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that only one case has been shown against the applicant in the Gang Chart which has been annexed at page-27 of the bail application and in the said case, the applicant has been granted bail by the competent Court. Apart from the case which has been shown against the applicant in the gang chart seven other cases are there against the applicant which have been explain in paragraph no.3 of the supplementary affidavit. The applicant is in jail since 2.12.2022.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.

¶10

Keeping in view the nature of submissions advanced and the provisions of Section 19 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, let the applicant- Golu @ Vineet Singh involved in Case Crime No.75 of 2022, under Section 3(1) U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, Police StationDhanpur, District Chandauli be enlarged on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two heavy sureties (one should be of family member) , each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following condition:-

¶11

(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶12

(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶15

Order Date :- 27.4.2023 Dev/-

¶16

Digitally signed by :- DEV PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Golu @ Vineet Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Golu @ Vineet Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mukesh Jaisawal and Another Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Firoz Ahmad Vs State of U.P.

Tej Pratap Singh @ Tiger Vs State of U.P.

Rahees Vs State of U.P.

Shashikesh @ Golu Shukla Vs State of U.P.

Krishna Mohan Nishad Vs State of U.P.