Allowed

Narendra and Another v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC27 Oct 2023BAIL/43915/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted bail to two applicants in a criminal trial case pending in the lower court. Bail was ordered on the ground of parity with a co-accused already released. Strict conditions regarding witness tampering, court attendance, and prohibition of adjournments were imposed.

What did the court decide?

Applicants released on bail by furnishing personal bond and two sureties each, subject to conditions regarding presence and conduct during trial.

Narendra and Another Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:204736

¶2

Court No. - 64

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 43915 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Narendra And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- R.S. Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.

¶7

The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicants, Narendra and Surendra @ Sheth, with a prayer to release them on bail in Case Crime No. 133 of 2023, under Sections-147, 148, 307, 323, 504, 452, 325, 302 IPC Police Station- Shivali, District- Kanpur Dehat, during pendency of trial.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that the coaccused, Sundar Lal, has been granted bail by this Court on 18.09.2023 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 36839 of 2023. The case of the applicants stand on identical footing, hence the applicants are also entitled for bail on the ground of parity for the reasons given in bail application of co-accused.

¶9

Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail, but does not dispute the claim of parity.

¶10

Let the applicants involved in aforesaid case be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:-

¶11

(i) The applicants shall not tamper with the evidence or threaten the witnesses.

¶12

(ii) The applicants shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this

¶13

condition, it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶14

(iii) The applicants shall remain present before the Trial Court on each date fixed, either personally or as directed by the Court. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the Trial Court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

(iv) In case the applicants misuse the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicants fail to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation then the Trial Court shall initiate proceedings against him in accordance with law under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

(v) The applicants shall remain present in person before the Trial Court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the Trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶17

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶18

Identity and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶19

Order Date :- 27.10.2023 Abhishek

¶20

Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Narendra and Another v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Narendra and Another v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mukul Bhasin Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Urmila Devi Vs State of U.P.

Harikanchan Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Kusum Devi and Another Vs State of U.P.

Aakil Vs State of U.P.

Ram Kumar Vs State of U.P.