Allowed

Devendra Tiwari @ Rajan Tiwari v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC31 Oct 2023BAIL/43570/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Allahabad High Court granted bail to Devendra Tiwari in a cheating and forgery case. The court found the applicant was falsely implicated, remained confined for over two months, and found no risk of evidence tampering or witness intimidation.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail by furnishing a personal bond and two sureties subject to conditions of appearance and non-tampering.

Devendra Tiwari @ Rajan Tiwari Vs State of U.P. — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:208064

¶2

Court No. - 74

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 43570 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Devendra Tiwari @ Rajan Tiwari Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Manoj Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State-opposite party.

¶7

The instant bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 711 of 2023, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., Police Station Gulriha, District Gorakhpur during the pendency of the trial.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the instant case. The applicant is a bonafide purchaser of the disputed property. The sale-deed was executed by co-accused Amit Kumar. The applicant himself has been cheated. The case is primarily of civil nature. The criminal history of the applicant has been explained in Paragraph-29 of the affidavit. The applicant is in jail since 12.08.2023 and if he is released on bail, he will not misuse the said liberty.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record.

¶10

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and after perusal of the record, this Court prima facie finds that the sale deed was executed by co-accused Amit Kumar. The applicant is a purchaser for value. Moreover, the applicant has remained confined for almost two and half months and after submission of the chargesheet there is no hope of early conclusion of trial, and no reasonable apprehension has been brought to the fore by the State that the applicant, if enlarged on bail, would either tamper with the evidence or delay the trial or intimidate the witness, therefore, without commenting on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.

¶11

Let the applicant- Devendra Tiwari @ Rajan Tiwari, involved in the aforesaid case, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Court concerned subject to the conditions that he:

¶12

(i) shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court;

¶13

(ii) shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; and,

¶14

(iii) shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses.

¶15

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court.

¶16

Order Date :- 31.10.2023 SKT/-

¶17

Digitally signed by :- SHIVA KANT TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Devendra Tiwari @ Rajan Tiwari v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Devendra Tiwari @ Rajan Tiwari v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nikki @ Bagga Vs State of U.P.

Sunita Devi Vs State of U.P.

Salman Vs State of U.P.

Deepak Vs State of U.P.

Chanchal Mishra Alias Ratnesh Vs State of U.P.

Shivendra Singh Vs State of U.P.