Allowed

Sachin@ Putaiya v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC16 Nov 2023BAIL/43197/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Allahabad High Court allowed a bail application filed by Sachin@ Putaiya under the U.P. Gangsters Act. The court released the applicant on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and two sureties, subject to standard conditions regarding evidence tampering and witness interference, without expressing an opinion on the merits of the offense.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court.

Sachin@ Putaiya Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:217283

¶2

Court No. - 75

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 43197 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Sachin@ Putaiya Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjay Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Sharma,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P. and perused the record.

¶7

The instant bail application has been filed with the prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 214 of 2023, under Section 2/3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Bewar, District- Mainpuri, during the pendency of the trial.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that according to the gang chart, two cases are shown against the applicant and in the said cases the applicant has been enlarged on bail. The bail orders have been annexed with the affidavit. It is further contended that the applicant is neither a gang leader nor a member of any gang. The offences are triable by Court of Magistrate. The applicant is in jail since 17.05.2023.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record.

¶10

Considering the rival submissions of learned counsel for parties, material available on record as well as in light of the submission of counsel for the applicant to the effect that while on bail in this case, the applicant would not commit any crime/offence nor would try to tamper the evidence or influence the witnesses in any manner, whatsoever it may be, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.

¶11

Let the applicant- Sachin@ Putaiya involved in the aforesaid case, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two

¶12

sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned on the following conditions that:

¶13

(i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; and,

¶14

(iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court.

¶15

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court.

¶16

Order Date :- 16.11.2023 S.Verma

¶17

Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sachin@ Putaiya v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sachin@ Putaiya v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vishambher Vs State of U.P.and 3 Others

Sakib Vs State of U.P.

Poonam Devi and Another Vs State of U.P.

Anar Singh Vs State of U.P.

Anar Singh Vs State of U.P.

Vimal Jatav Vs State of U.P.