Dhunnu v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge dismissed a bail application as infructuous on the ground that the trial had already concluded, with no objection from the prosecution.
What did the court decide?
Bail application dismissed as infructuous due to conclusion of trial.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:144752
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 43027 of 2017
Applicant :- Dhunnu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Chandra Badan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
- Sri Chandra Badan, learned counsel for the applicant submits that instant bail application be dismissed as infructuous as trial of the case has already been concluded.
- Learned AGA is having no objection.
- In view of above, the instant bail application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 20.7.2023 AK Pandey
Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM KUMAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application should be allowed or dismissed given the case has been concluded.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Dhunnu
Coram
Sameer Jain
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/43027/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court