In a bail application under Section 438 CrPC, the High Court allowed bail to the applicant, a former Branch Manager accused of cheating and forgery, noting that the involved amount was deposited and no past criminal record existed.
Order of release on bail subject to personal bond and two sureties on conditions of not tampering with evidence or witnesses.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:211388
Court No. - 75
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 40893 of 2023
Applicant :- Sushil Kumar Sharma Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Seema Singh,Ramesh Chandra Chaturvedi,Tripti Chaturvedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Santosh Kumar Tripathi
Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Sharma,J.
i. the applicant shall not temper with the prosecution evidence;
ii. the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witness;
iii. the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court.
Order Date :- 2.11.2023 Vikram
Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to enlargement on bail in a cheating and forgery case where the alleged amount was deposited.
6 provisions across 1 enactments
Sushil Kumar Sharma
State of U.P.
Vikram Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
