Having heard the learned counsel for applicant, the learned A.G.A. for State, upon perusal of material brought on record, as well as complicity of applicant, accusation made coupled with the fact that applicant is devar of the deceased, the applicant cannot be said to be benificarly of alleged demand of dowry, the amount of Rs. 50,000/- was transmitted by first informant directly in the bank account of husband of deceased, neither in the F.I.R. nor in the statement of first informant, the material particulars with regard to manner of demand of dowry or commission of physical and mental cruelty upon deceased on account of non fulfilment of alleged demand of dowry, has been detailed, placing reliance upon the judgement of Supreme Court in Kahkashan Kausar @ Sonam and Others Vs. State of Bihar and Others, (2022) 6 SCC 599, the said allegations insofar as they relate to applicant are liable to be ignored by this Court at this stage, clean antecedents, of applicant period of incarceration undergone, in view of the nature of death of deceased, applicant is not liable to be awarded the maximum sentence under section 304B IPC, the Police Report in terms of Section 173 (2) Cr.P.C. has already been submitted, as such, the entire evidence sought to be relied upon by the
