Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Vikendra @ Billu Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

Home
Allahabad HC
2023
Vikendra @ Billu Vs State of U.P.Vikendra @ Billu v. State of U.P.

Dismissed

Vikendra @ Billu v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC12 Jul 2023BAIL/39476/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge order dismissing a second bail application for want of prosecution as the applicant did not appear in court to press the matter.

What the court decided

AI extract

Cite this judgement

Vikendra @ Billu v. State of U.P., BAIL/39476/2021 (ALL), decided on 12 July 2023.

The Allahabad High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

Samit Gopal

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Bail application dismissed as the applicant failed to appear despite having counsel listed for the cause. The order is dismissed for want of prosecution.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

A

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:138031

Court No. - 69

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 39476 of 2021

Applicant :- Vikendra @ Billu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Pintu Tiwari,Pawan Singh Pundir Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.

The matter has been taken up in the revised list. No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this second bail application. Sri J.P. Tripathi, learned counsel for the State is present.

This is a second bail application. The first bail application on behalf of the applicant was rejected by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 12.08.2021 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.26224 of 2021.

There is no representation on behalf of the applicant despite the fact that there are two learned counsels on behalf of the applicant and the matter is of the year 2021. The order sheet shows that previously the matter was adjourned on the request of learned counsel for the applicant.

In view of the above, the present bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Samit Gopal, J.)

Order Date :- 12.7.2023 Gaurav Kuls

Digitally signed by :- GAURAV KULSHRESTHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Parties & counsel

AI extract

applicant
Vikendra @ Billu

Coram

AI extract

Samit Gopal

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Allahabad HC
Decided on: 12 Jul 2023 · July
Registered: 24 Sept 2021
Case no.: BAIL/39476/2021
CNR: UPHC011278372021
Topic: Bail and Remand
Bench: Samit Gopal
Disposal: Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Samit Gopal

Father Apolin Lobo Ex-Director Vs State of U.P. and Others
11 Jul 2023
Sanjay Kumar Ladda Vs State of U.P. and Another
11 Jul 2023
Manish Shukla Vs State of U.P.
11 Jul 2023
Zubair Vs State of U.P.
12 Jul 2023
Maneshar and Another Vs State of U.P.
12 Jul 2023
Ali Hasan Vs State of U.P. through Secretary Home and 3 Others
12 Jul 2023