Having heard the learned counsel for applicant, the learned A.G.A. for State, upon perusal of material brought on record, evidence, nature and gravity of offense as well as complicity of applicant, accusation made coupled with the fact that prosecutrix in her statement under section 161/164 Cr.P.C. has remained clear, categorical and consistent, the prosecutrix has fully supported the occurrence, the medical opinion expressed by the Doctor who medically examined, the Doctor also supports the F.I.R, the prosecutrix is a young girl aged about 17 years and two months. Up to this stage, there is nothing on record on the basis of which, it cannot be inferred that prosecution story is false or there is malicious prosecution of applicant, no such material has been brought on record so as to infer the false implication of applicant ini the crime in question to doubt the credibility of prosecutrix, therefore irrespective of the submissions urged by the learned counsel for applicant in support of present application for bail, but without making any comment on the merits of the case, this Court does not find any good ground to enlarge the applicant on bail.
