Kamil v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court discharged Kamil on bail in a criminal case under the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities Act based on arguments of false implication and lack of criminal history, without weighing merits.
What did the court decide?
Release on bail with personal bond and two sureties.
What the court decided
Court No. - 74
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3720 of 2023
Applicant :- Kamil Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sudhir Kumar Agarwal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
By means of the bail application the applicant has prayed to be enlarged on bail in Case Crime No. 01 of 2023 at Police Station- Nai Mandi, DistrictMuzaffarnagar under Section 2/3 of U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant is in jail since 02.01.2023.
The bail application of the applicant was rejected by the learned trial court on 12.01.2023.
The following arguments made by Sri Chandramani Singh, learned counsel holding brief of Sri Sunil Kumar Agarwal, learned counsel on behalf of the applicant, which could not be satisfactorily refuted by Sri Munne Lal, learned AGA from the record, entitle the applicant for grant of bail:
(1). The applicant has been falsely implicated in the instant case.
(2). The applicant has been enlarged on bail in the two criminal cases depicted in the gang chart.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail in a case under the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Kamil
Coram
Ajay Bhanot
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/3720/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court