Rameshwar Prasad v. State of Up
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No.…
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 81
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3666 of 2021
Applicant :- Rameshwar Prasad Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ashish Goyal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Saroj Yadav,J.
At the very outset, Ms. Manju Yadav, Advocate holding brief of Sri Ashish Goyal, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that in the present case trial has been concluded and the accused applicant has been acquitted, as such, the present bail application has become infructuous.
In view of the aforesaid statement made by learned counsel for the applicant, this bail application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(Mrs. Saroj Yadav, J.)
Order Date :- 2.2.2023 Arun
Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Rameshwar Prasad
Saroj Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court