Officer, submitted the charge sheet dated 18.04.2023 whereby applicant has been charge sheeted under Sections 498A, 304B, 328 L.P.C. and Sections 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act. 9. Learned counsel for applicant scontends that though the applicant is husband of deceased, a named as well as charge- sheeted accused yet he is liable to be enlarged on bail. Occurrence giving rise to present application for bail has occurred after expiry of a period of two years and nine months approximately from the date of marriage of applicant with the deceased. From the aforesaid wedlock a male child was born. In the aforesaid precarious circumstance, it is thus urged that by no stretch of imagination it can be presumed that applicant shall cause the death of the deceased. With reference to the material on record, he submits that the deceased was a short tempered lady and she has taken the extreme step of terminating her life by consuming some poisonous substance. Bonafide of the applicant is also explicit from the fact that applicant himself took the victim to the hospital which fact is established from the documents occurring at pages 17 and 18 of the paper book. It is then contended Autopsy Surgeon, who conducted autopsy of the body of deceased, did not fined any internal or external injury on the body of the deceased. According to the learned counsel for applicant, upto this stage, there is nothing on record to conclude that the deceased committed suicide on account of an immediate act of applicant. No such material has emerged as yet on the basis of which instigation could be inferred against applicant on account of his conduct. No abetment, instigation or conspiracy could be inferred against applicant from the record either. Allegations made in the F.I.R. with regard to demand of additional dowry and commission of physical and mental cruelty upon deceased on account of non-fulfilment of additional demand of dowry are
