Allowed

Chandrakesh v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC11 Aug 2023BAIL/34138/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This High Court bail application contested bail for an applicant charged under the U.P. Gangster Act facing a criminal trial. The court granted bail, noting the applicant had been on bail in other cases and accepting counsel's submission of innocence without adjudicating the case's merits.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail subject to a personal bond, two sureties, and undertakings regarding attendance, address, and property.

Chandrakesh Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:162962

¶2

Court No. - 77

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34138 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Chandrakesh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sudarshan Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Mrs. Renu Agarwal,J.

¶6

Heard Mr. Sudarshan Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶7

The present first bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime No. 140 of 2022 under Sections 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster & Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1986 Police Station Shahbad, District Rampur with the prayer to enlarge him on bail.

¶8

Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the instant case due to malafide intentions. According to gang-chart (Annexure No.2), total 7 cases are said to be registered against the accused-applicant out of which only one case is registered under the Gangster Act and rest of the cases are the criminal history of the applicant. It is further submitted that applicant has been enlarged on bail in all the cases mentioned in the Gang-Chart and copy of the bail order is annexed with the bail application and marked as Annexure No. 3 and 4. Applicant is languishing in jail since 03.07.2021 and if he is granted the liberty of bail he will not misuse the same and would cooperate in the trial proceedings.

¶9

On the other hand, learned AGA has opposed the prayer of bail but

¶10

could not controvert the aforesaid arguments as advanced by learned counsel for the applicant.

¶11

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account that the accused-applicant has been enlarged on bail in the cases shown in the gang-chart and cases apart from the gang-chart and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, it would be appropriate to enlarge the accused-applicant on bail.

¶12

Let applicant Chandrakesh be released on bail in the above case crime number and on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Court concerned with the following conditions :-

¶13

(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶14

(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of

¶17

charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶18

(v) The applicant shall also furnish an undertaking from the sureties that the properties (movable/immovable) which are the basis of accepting the surety, shall not be disposed of by them till the conclusion of trial.

¶19

(vi) The applicant shall also give an undertaking to the effect that he will not change his address without prior intimation to the trial court concerned.

¶20

(Renu Agarwal,J.)

¶21

Order Date :- 11.8.2023 Karan

¶22

Digitally signed by :- KUMAR KARAN RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Chandrakesh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandrakesh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anuj @ Phukkadi Vs State of U.P.

Ashahar Alias Shebu Vs State of U.P.

Sadaan Vs State of U.P.

Hasnain Vs State of U.P.

Kuldeep Goswami Vs State of U.P.

Amir Vs State of U.P.