Ayushpal Alias Chintu v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
This brief order dismisses a criminal bail application as infructuous because the applicant had already been acquitted by the lower court.
This brief order dismisses a criminal bail application as infructuous because the applicant had already been acquitted by the lower court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 86
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32259 of 2022
Applicant :- Ayushpal Alias Chintu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Chandra Bhushan Prasad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mayank Kumar Jain,J.
Heard Sri Chandra Bhushan Prasad, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State-respondent.
Sri Chandra Bhushan Prasad, learned counsel for the applicant states that present bail application has become infructuous, as the applicant has already been acquitted by the lower court and, therefore, it may be dismissed as infructuous
In view of the aforesaid, the present bail application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 2.1.2023 T.S.
Digitally signed by :- TRIBHUWAN SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Ayushpal Alias Chintu
State of U.P.
Mayank Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court