Saurabh Yadav @ Kandu Yadav v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
In this repeat bail application, the Allahabad High Court examined the applicant's claim of clean antecedents and the delay in trial against the established guilt based on recovered weapon and eyewitness testimony, ultimately refusing fresh grounds for bail.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:169851
Court No. - 65
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 30225 of 2023
Applicant :- Saurabh Yadav @ Kandu Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ramanuj Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Heard Mr. Ramanuj Yadav, the learned counsel for applicant and the learned A.G.A. for State.
Perused the record.
This is a repeat application for bail filed by applicant Saurabh Yadav @ Kandu Yadav seeking his enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 104 of 2022, under Sections 302, 120-B IPC, Police Station- Ajnar, District Mahoba during the pendency of trial i.e. Sessions Trial No. 412 of 2022, is now pending in the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.1, Mahoba.
First bail application of applicant i.e. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 38000 of 2022 (Saurabh Yadav @ Kandu Yadav Vs. State of U.P) was rejected by this court by a detailed order dated 24.11.2022. For ready reference, the same is reproduced herein under:
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether fresh grounds were made out to enlarge the applicant on bail in a repeat application after one prior bail petition was rejected.
Whether the recovery of the weapon of assault and the testimony of prosecution witnesses establish complicity warranting bail rejection.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Saurabh Yadav @ Kandu Yadav
Coram
Rajeev Misra
Arshad Mahmood
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/30225/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court