In this second bail application, the Allahabad High Court rejected the prayer for enlargement on bail. The Court distinguished the bail of a co-accused, noting different reasons for trial delay and the serious nature of allegations involving attempt to murder.
Bail application rejected; applicant not entitled to release on bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:202274
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 30223 of 2023
Applicant :- Mohammad @ Raju Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Vipul Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
passed, therefore, no benefit can be extended to the applicant, therefore, instant second bail application is liable to be dismissed.
Order Date :- 18.10.2023 AK Pandey
Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM KUMAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to release on bail considering the seriousness of allegations and lack of material regarding trial delay.
Whether parity with bail granted to a co-accused can be extended when reasons for delay differ.
Mohammad @ Raju
Hon'ble Sameer Jain, J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
