Danish v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Allahabad High Court rejected a bail application in a case involving an alleged attempt to murder and illegal possession of arms. The court noted the applicant was assigned a specific role in causing a grievous injury with a knife and denied bail.
What did the court decide?
Bail application rejected.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:167466
Court No. - 74
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 29481 of 2023
Applicant :- Danish Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Deepak Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
- Supplementary affidavit, filed by the counsel for the applicant, is taken on record.
- Heard counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
- The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 18 of 2023, under Section 307 I.P.C. and Section 4/25 Arms Act, Police Station- Kotwali Nagar, District- Aligarh.
- Learned counsel for the applicant contends that on account of enmity, the applicant has been falsely implicated. The applicant is in jail since 02.02.2023 having no criminal history.
- Learned AGA for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail under Section 437 Cr.P.C. despite a specific role in inflicting a grievous abdominal wound with a sharp weapon.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Danish
Coram
Vivek Varma
Siddharth Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/29481/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court