The 83rd Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application was allowed. The court held that the applicant made out a case for bail despite not expressing an opinion on the merits.
The applicant was released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties subject to specific conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 83
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2825 of 2023
Applicant :- Sandeep @ Chandan Nishad Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Vidya Kant Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
(i) The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
(ii) The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
(iii) The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
(iv) The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected of the commission of which he is suspected.
(v) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
Order Date :- 2.3.2023 Vikas
Digitally signed by :- VIKAS VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail in a case involving Sections 498-A, 304-B IPC, and Dowry Prohibition Act.
Sandeep @ Chandan Nishad
State of U.P.
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
