Partly allowed

Rahul Kashyap v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC17 Feb 2023BAIL/2821/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court allowed an interim bail application filed by Rahul Kashyap, who was a witness in another case related to the chargesheeted offence, granted bail pending final assistance to the court in the investigation on the plea of chance encounter.

What did the court decide?

Interim bail granted to applicant on prima facie grounds of being a witness in a related case and chance encounter plea.

Rahul Kashyap Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Court No. - 79

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2821 of 2023

¶3

Applicant :- Rahul Kashyap Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Mayank Yadav,Vivek Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶5

orZeku nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd jkgqy d’;i dh vksj ls eq0v0la0 161 lu 2020] vUrxZr /kkjk 302] 34] 504] 506 Hkk0na0fo0 ,oa 3@4 ikDlks ,sDV] Fkkuk lj/kuk] ftyk esjB esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶6

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu

¶7

fd;kA

¶8

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd vkosnd dk ;g f}rh; tekur vkosnu i= gS] mldk izFke tekur vkosnu i= la0 45888 lu 2020 bl U;k;ky; dh vU; U;k;ihB ds vkns’k fn0 29&6&2021 }kjk fujLr fd;k x;k Fkk] blds 1 ckn dbZ vfHk;kstu lkf{k;ksa dk c;ku voj U;k;ky; esa gks pqdk gS] ftuesa ls ih0MCyw0 1 Jherh deys’k ds c;ku esa vk;k gS fd ?kVuk ds yxHkx Ms< eghus ckn mls cnek’kksa ds uke irk pys Fks] ih0MCyw0 2 vafdr dqekj ds c;ku esa vk;k gS fd mlus rFkkdfFkr ?kVuk gksrs ugha ns[kk bl izdkj ;g lk{kh i{knzksgh gks x;k gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd bl izdj.k esa lg vfHk;qDr eYyw mQZ vt; dh tekur] tekur vkosnu i= la0 48862 lu 2020 esa bl U;k;ky; dh vU; U;k;ihB ds vkns’k fn0 21 }kjk Lohd`r gks pqdh gS rFkk lg vfHk;qDr v:.k] cUVh mQZ jfo 'kadj ,oa vafdr dqekj dh tekur Hkh bl U;k;ky; dh fofHkUu U;k;ihBksa ds vkns’kksa }kjk Lohdkj dh tk pqdh gS] vkosnd funksZ"k gS rFkk og bl izdj.k esa fn0 30&6&2020 ls dkjkxkj es a fu:) gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A

¶9

fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ dk izcy fojks/k djrs gq, rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd vkosnd }kjk dkfjr vijk/k laKs; ,oa xEHkhj izd`fr dk gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij u NksM+k tk;A

¶10

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ ds ifjizs{; esa i=koyh ij miyC/k lkjoku rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dk lexz :i ls voyksdu djus ds ckn] lcwrksa dh izd`fr vkSj fdlh Hkh Bksl fojks/kkRed lkexzh dh vuqifLFkfr ,oa miyC/k lkexzh ls NsM+NkM+ dh laHkkouk u gksus ds rF; dks ns[krs gq, esjh jk; esa vkosnd dks tekur ij eqDr djus dk mi;qDr vk/kkj gSA

¶11

vr% okn ds xq.k nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fVIi.kh fd, gq, vkosnd dks mijksDr of.kZr vijk/k esa lacaf/kr U;k;ky; dh lUrqf"V ij O;fDrxr ca/k&i= ,oa vf/kd /kujkf’k ds nks LFkkuh; izfrHkw izLrqr djus ij fuEufyf[kr 'krksZ ds lkFk tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A

¶12

1& vkosnd foospuk ;k ijh{k.k ds nkSjku vfHk;kstu lk{;ksa ds lkFk NsM + NkM+ ugha djsxkA

¶13

2& vkosnd vfHk;kstu lkf{k;ksa o ihfM+r@f’kdk;rdrkZ dks Mjk;sxk@/kedk;sxk ughaA

¶14

3& vkosnd U;k;ky; ds vkns’kksa dk ikyu djsxk] og ijh{k.k ds nkSjku fcuk dksbZ vuko’;d LFkxu fy, fu;r frfFk ij U;k;ky; esa mifLFkr gksxk rFkk ijh{k.k esa bZekunkjh ls lg;ksx djsxkA

¶15

4& vkosnd tekur ij fjgk gksus ds ckn tekur dh Lora=rk dk nq:i;ksx ugha djsxk vkSj fdlh Hkh vijkf/kd xfrfof/k esa fyIr ugha gksxk u dksbZ vijkf/kd d`R; djsxkA

¶16

5& vkosnd izR;{k ;k vizR;{k :i ls ekeys ds rF;ksa ls ifjfpr fdlh Hkh O;fDr ;k iqfyl vf/kdkfj;ksa dks dksbZ izyksHku ;k /kedh ugha nsxk u gh muls dksbZ ok;nk djsxk] ftlds dkj.k mUgsa U;k;ky; esa rF;ksa dks mtkxj djus ls fojr jguk iM+sA

¶17

mijksDr 'krksZ esa ls fdlh ds mYya?ku ds ekeys esa] ijh{k.k U;k;ky; vkosnd dh tekur fu;ekuqlkj jn~n djus dks Lora= gSA

¶18

fn0 % 17&2&2023

¶19

ds0lh0flag

¶20

Digitally signed by :- KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Rahul Kashyap v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rahul Kashyap v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Farukh Vs State of U.P.

Shahnawaz Vs State of U.P.

Mamta Hansda @ Mamisha Vs State of U.P. and Another

Chhote Lal Vs State of U.P.

Babloo @ Mahfooz Vs State of U.P.

Banti Vs State of U.P.