Kuldeep v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Third bail application rejected. Court found no new or good ground to grant bail; the role of strangulation was specifically assigned to the applicant, and trial delay was due to accused's own conduct.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:146486
Court No. - 65
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 23424 of 2023
Applicant :- Kuldeep Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Vikash Chandra Tiwari,Nitin Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
- Heard Mr. Nitin Sharma, the learned counsel for applicant and the learned A.G.A. for State.
- Perused the record.
- This is second repeat application for bail filed by applicantKuldeep seeking his enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 311 of 2021, under Sections 147, 148, 302, 34, 120B IPC, Police Station-Pilkhauwa, District-Hapur during the pendency of trial i.e. Sessions Trial No. 41 of 2022 (State Vs. Govinda and Others), under Sections 147, 148, 302, 34, 120B, 216 IPC, Police Station-Pilkhauwa, District-Hapur now pending in the court of Additional District Judge/Special Judge, MP/MLA, Hapur.
- Record shows that the first bail application of applicant was rejected by a detailed order dated 07.03.2022 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 43082 o 2021 (Shailesh Vs. State of U.P. and Others) along with connected matters. For ready reference, the order dated 07.03.2022 is reproduced hereinunder:-
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant should be enlarged on bail pending trial when the first two bail applications were rejected and no new ground exists.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Kuldeep
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Rajeev Misra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/23424/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court