Sangprit v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a criminal bail application as infructuous since the learned court reported that the applicant had already been acquitted by the trial court prior to the hearing.
What did the court decide?
The bail application is dismissed as infructuous due to the applicant's acquittal.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:236800
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 23347 of 2020
Applicant :- Sangprit Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Chandra Bhan Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Manohar Prasad Gupta
Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
- None appeared either on behalf of the applicant or on behalf of the informant even in the revised call. However, learned AGA for the State-respondent is present.
- On 28.11.2023 trial court was directed to submit report with regard to the current status of the trial.
- Pursuant to the order passed by this Court trial court transmitted its report and from its perusal, it reflects that applicant has already been acquitted by the trial court on 22.3.2021 and therefore, it appears that the instant bail application has become infructuous.
- In view of the above, the instant bail application stands dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 14.12.2023 Ankita
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a bail application pending before this court becomes infructuous after the applicant's acquittal by the trial court.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sangprit
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Sameer Jain
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/23347/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court