In a criminal bail application involving offences under IPC and IT Act, the Allahabad High Court allowed bail considering the applicant's innocence, lack of criminal history, and co-accused bail, referring to Satendra Kumar Antil.
Release on bail by furnishing a personal bond and two sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:117122
Court No. - 86
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 22882 of 2023
Applicant :- Sahadat Ali Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Pankaj Satsangi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
i. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by
intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.
ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.
iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
Order Date :- 22.5.2023 Dev/-
Digitally signed by :- DEV PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant, challennged on allegations of cheating and forgery, is entitled to bail.
Whether parity with a co-accused already granted bail warrants the applicant's release.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. C.B.I. & AnotherReferred¶10
Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. C.B.I. & Another, passed in S.L.P.(Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sahadat Ali
State of U.P.
Vivek Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
