Court rejected bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in a corruption case (PvA, IPC 120B) where the applicant was caught red-handed demanding a bribe for an electricity connection.
Bail application rejected; accused ordered not to be enlarged on bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 87
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2287 of 2023
Applicant :- Rahul Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ravinath Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.
accused-applicant and co-accused were caught red handed demanding and accepting bribe amount of Rs.10,000/- for electricity connection to the complainant, this Court, at this stage, does not find any ground to enlarge the accused-applicant on bail. This bail application is rejected.
Order Date :- 18.1.2023 prateek
Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the accused-applicant is entitled to bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. given the red-handed capture in a corruption case.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Rahul Kumar
State of U.P.
Dinesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Dinesh Kumar
Parties & counsel
