Geeta Devi v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The application for bail was dismissed as infructuous because the applicant had already been released from jail prior to the decision.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:198920
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 22439 of 2020
Applicant :- Geeta Devi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Mobin Ansari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
None appeared on behalf of the applicant even in the revised call.
However, learned A.G.A. is present.
On 21.09.2023, the Jailor concerned was directed to submit a report whether the applicant wants to engage another counsel of his own choice or not.
As per report of the Jailor concerned dated 11.10.2023, the applicant has already been released from the jail and, therefore, it appears that the instant bail application has become infructuous.
In view of the above, the instant bail application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 13.10.2023 Madhurima
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Geeta Devi
Coram
Sameer Jain
Madhurima Garg
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/22439/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court