Naseema v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The bail application was dismissed as infructuous because the applicant had already been acquitted.
What the court decided
Court No. - 83
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 20021 of 2020
Applicant :- Naseema Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Aslam,Satyendra Narayan Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
List has been revised.
Learned counsel for the applicant has stated that the applicant has been acquitted, as such, the bail application is rendered infructuous and may be dismissed as infructuous.
Accordingly, the bail application stands dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 10.2.2023 Shalini
Digitally signed by :- SHALINI JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Naseema
Coram
Krishan Pahal
Shalini Jaiswal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/20021/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court