Allowed

Tarun @ Bhoora v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC12 Jun 2023BAIL/18897/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Allahabad High Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 18897 of 2023 allowed the bail of applicant Tarun @ Bhoora for furnishing a personal bond and two sureties in Case Crime No. 15 of 2023.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail by furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, subject to conditions regarding tampering, attendance, and unlawful activity.

Tarun @ Bhoora Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:126188

¶2

Court No. - 65 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 18897 of 2023 Applicant :- Tarun @ Bhoora Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Vikash Chandra Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶3

Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.

¶4

Heard Sri Vikash Chandra Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the material on record.

¶5

Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. The applicant was not named in the F.I.R. and his name is surfaced in the confessional statement of co-accused Ashu @ Aas Mohammad. As per allegation of F.I.R., the accused persons had opened fire upon the police personnel but no one has received gun shot injury. Lastly, it is submitted that co-accused Ashu @ Aas Mohammad had already been granted bail by the Sessions Judge vide order dated 22.2.2023. The criminal history of the applicant has been explained in para 6 of the affidavit filed in support of bail application. He next submits that the applicant is in jail since 15.2.2022 and if he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶6

Learned AGA for the State vehemently opposed the prayer of bail.

¶7

Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties and upon the perusal of the record and considering the complicity of accused, severity of punishment as well as totality of facts and circumstances, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, I find it a fit case for bail. The bail application is allowed.

¶8

Let applicant- Tarun @ Bhoora be released on bail in Case Crime No.15 of 2023, under Sections 307, 414, 482, 34 I.P.C. and Section 3/25 Arms Act, registered at P.S. Dhaulana,, District Hapur, on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Court concerned, subject to the following conditions:

¶9

(i) The applicant will not tamper with prosecution evidence and will not harm or harass the victim/complainant in any manner whatsoever.

¶10

(ii) The applicant will abide by the orders of the court, will attend the court on every date and will not delay the disposal of trial in any manner whatsoever.

¶11

(iii) The applicant will not indulge in any unlawful activity.

¶12

(iv) The applicant will not misuse the liberty of bail in any manner whatsoever.

¶13

The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by the court concerned and in case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, court concerned will be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison.

¶14

Order Date :- 12.6.2023 Kpy

¶15

Digitally signed by :- KAVLESHWAR PRASAD YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Tarun @ Bhoora v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tarun @ Bhoora v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Faizu @ Seebu Vs State of U.P.

Smt. Neelam Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Asraf Ali and Another Vs State of U.P.

Kuldeep Vs State of U.P. and Another

Naseemuddin Vs State of U.P. and Another

Rama Shankar Gautam Vs State of Uttar Pradesh and 3 Others