It has been argued by learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is submitted that the first information report was lodged against as many as 10 persons while the charge sheet has been submitted only against three persons. The F.I.R. has been lodged after ten days of the incident and in this regard, no explanation has been given by the informant. It is submitted that there was some property dispute between the parties, therefore, to create pressure, the present F.I.R. has been lodged against the applicant including the other family members. It is submitted that medical report does not corroborate the version of rape as alleged against the applicant. So far as the matrimonial dispute is concerned, the compromise has been taken place between husband and wife. It is submitted that there are material contradiction in the statements of victim recorded under Section 161 and 164 Cr.P.C. It is further submitted that applicant is languishing in jail since 12.03.2022 having no criminal history and that in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.
