Allowed

Khurseed Ansari v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC26 Jun 2023BAIL/16934/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Allahabad High Court allowed a bail application filed by Khurseed Ansari in a case involving cheating and forgery. The applicant, who was not named in the FIR and had co-accused granted bail, was released on a personal bond and two sureties with specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

The applicant Khurseed Ansari was released on bail on producing a personal bond and two sureties subject to conditions.

Khurseed Ansari Vs State of U.P. and Another — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:128796

¶2

Court No. - 75

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 16934 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Khurseed Ansari Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Bhriguram Ji,Shashi Shankar Shukla,Shashi Shekhar Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi,J.

¶6

Supplementary affidavit filed today in the Court is taken on record.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶8

The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant with a prayer to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No.106 of 2023, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 406 I.P.C., P.S. Khorabar, District Gorakhpur, during pendency of the trial.

¶9

It is alleged in the F.I.R. that informant paid Rs.70,000/- for processing visa and ticket in the name of Sky Tavel Agency. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. The applicant is not named in the F.I.R. He is employee of Star Travel Agency. The amount has been paid to Tehzeeb Ansari. The applicant has no concern with the alleged amount. After arrest, the applicant has been implicated in four cases. The applicant has no criminal history. Moreover, there is no prospect of trial of the present case being concluded in near future. The applicant is languishing in jail since 10.02.2023 and in case, he is enlarged on bail he will not misuse the liberty of bail and co-operate in trial. It is further submitted that the co-accused Dinesh Paswan and Jamil Khan with identical role have been granted bail by co-ordinate benches of this Court.

¶10

Learned A.G.A. opposed the bail prayer of the applicant.

¶11

Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case,

¶12

submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and the law laid down by the Apex Court in Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. C.B.I. & Another, passed in S.L.P.(Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.

¶13

Let the applicant, Khurseed Ansari , who is involved in the aforesaid case crime, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.

¶14

The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

¶15

The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶16

The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶17

Order Date :- 26.6.2023 Aditya Tripathi/SP/-

¶18

Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Khurseed Ansari v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Khurseed Ansari v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashwani Alias Soni Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Savitri Devi Vs State of U.P.

Pawan Kumar Pandey and Another Vs State of U.P. and Anothers

Bhonu Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Tahir Ali and 2 Others Vs State of U.P.

Navi Mohammad Vs State of U.P. and Another