Indrajeet Narayan Singh v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application rejected for applicant charged with kidnapping and sexual assault under IPC and POCSO Act. Court noted victim is minor per admitting school certificate despite conflicting birth dates. Bail denied due to gravity of offence. Court deferred recording victim statement pending certified copy of order.
What did the court decide?
Bail application rejected. Revival of custody to police custody pending trial. Recording of victim statement directed.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:111816
Court No. - 79
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 16531 of 2023
Applicant :- Indrajeet Narayan Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Kamal Dev Rai, Ajay Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A., Sudhir Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Mayank Kumar Jain,J.
Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of applicant and the counter affidavit filed on behalf of informant in Court today, are taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the entire record.
The present bail application has been filed on behalf of applicant in Case Crime No. 125 of 2022, under Sections 363, 366, 376 I.P.C. and Section 5 J(ii)/6 of POCSO Act, Police Station Rewatipur, District Ghazipur with the prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail.
It is submitted by learned counsel for applicant that applicant is innocent and has not committed any offence as alleged in the first information report. The victim in her statement recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. did not make any allegation of kidnapping against the applicant but stated that she accompanied the applicant with her own accord. Since the applicant is a teacher, the victim fell in love with the applicant. The victim in her statement recorded under section 164 Cr.P.C. she reiterated the aforesaid version as of 161 Cr.P.C. The victim is a major. She refused to undergo her medical examination. No allegation of rape has been leveled against the applicant. It is also stated that as per Bihar State School Secondary Examination, 2023 the date of birth of the victim has been mentioned as 29.11.2005 and further the victim is having pregnancy of about nine weeks. Learned counsel for applicant lastly submits that applicant is in jail since 07.01.2023 having no criminal history and that in case applicant is enlarged on bail, applicant will not misuse the liberty of bail.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant, charged with offences including kidnapping and sexual assault involving a minor victim, is entitled to bail.
Whether conflicting dates of birth in F.I.R. and secondary admission records affect the determination of bail in a POCSO case.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Indrajeet Narayan Singh
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Mayank Kumar Jain
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/16531/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court