Allowed

Sachin v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC23 May 2023BAIL/16010/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this criminal miscellaneous bail application arising under the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, the Allahabad High Court released the applicant on bail. The court found it a fit case for bail, noting the applicant's cooperation, ability to furnish sureties, and lack of flight risk.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties.

Sachin Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:118709

¶2

Court No. - 86

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 16010 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Sachin Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Santosh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶7

The submission of the learned counsel for the applicant is that the accused applicant is in jail since 14.02.2023. In the gang chart only one case has been shown against the accused applicant and in that case the accused applicant has already been released on bail and the bail order is annexed as Annexure no. 3 to the affidavit filed in support of the bail application. Further submission is that apart from gang chart accused applicant has criminal history of five more cases and the same has been explained in para 8 of the affidavit filed in support of the bail application. It is further submitted that applicant is prepared to furnish sureties and bonds and there is no possibility of his either fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the evidence. Applicant undertakes that he will not misuse the liberty of bail, if granted and cooperate in trial.

¶8

Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer of bail. He has however not disputed the aforesaid facts.

¶9

Upon hearing the submissions made by learned counsel of both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting on the merits of the case, I find it to be a fit case for bail.

¶10

Let applicant Sachin be released on bail in Case Crime No. 35 of 2023, under Section 3(1) U.P. Gangster & Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, P.S. Saidnagali , District Amroha , on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-

¶11

(i) The applicant will not tamper with prosecution evidence and

¶12

will not harm or harass the victim/complainant in any manner whatsoever.

¶13

(ii) The applicant will abide the orders of court, will attend the court on every date and will not delay the disposal of trial in any manner whatsoever.

¶14

(iii) The applicant will not indulge in any unlawful activities.

¶15

(iv) The applicant will not misuse the liberty of bail in any manner whatsoever.

¶16

The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by court concerned and in case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, court concerned will be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison.

¶17

Order Date :- 23.5.2023

¶18

Bhanu

¶19

Digitally signed by :- BHANU PRATAP KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sachin v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sachin v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sangram Singh @ Raju Vs State of U.P.

Chandrapal @ Dhulle Vs State of U.P.

Banti @ Umar Ahamad Vs State of U.P.

Sanjay Verma Vs State of U.P.

Indra Jeet Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Vinay Pratap Vs State of U.P.