The court allowed a bail application for an accused in a kidnapping and murder case, crediting the informant's delay in filing the FIR as grounds for release, without expressing an opinion on the merits of the charges.
Release on bail furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each with standard isnt of attendance, no inducement, and no criminal activity.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 74
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15117 of 2023
Applicant :- Sheeshpal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Anuj Kumar Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Chandra Nath Bhatt
Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
(i) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the dates fixed, unless his personal presence is exempted.
(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal and anti-social activity.
application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case during trial.
Order Date :- 3.5.2023 AK Pandey
Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM KUMAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail considering the delay in lodging the FIR and lack of explanation by the informant.
Sheeshpal
State of U.P.
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
