Bail application allowed. Court held applicant has made out a case for bail without expressing opinion on merits, applying trial court conditions.
Released on bail on furnishing personal bond and two heavy local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:155426
Court No. - 68
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1507 of 2023
Applicant :- Amarjeet Nishad Alias Mitthu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Karunesh Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.
not show any external or internal injury as well as mark of rope upon her body. Learned counsel further submits that in fact, the applicant was arrested on 20.09.2022 in Case Crime No. 401 of 2022 under Sections 457, 380, 411 I.P.C. and the police has falsely implicated the applicant in the present case. It is thus contended that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case . Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused have also been mentioned. It has also been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required and is also ready to accept all the conditions which the Court may deem fit to impose upon him. He next submits that applicant is languishing in jail since 20.09.2022.
be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two heavy local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions:-
I. The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence and the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.
II. The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.
III. In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.
IV. The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court default of this condition is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of his bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
Order Date :- 3.8.2023
S.Ali
Digitally signed by :- SHAUKAT ALI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant has made out a case for bail despite being accused of rape, robbery, and盗窃罪.
Amarjeet Nishad Alias Mitthu
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
