Single Judge allowed bail to the applicant in a cheating and forgery case, finding no evidence of planning, absence of absconding inclination, and no prior knowledge by the applicant.
Released on bail subject to furnishing bond, appearing as required, abiding by court orders, refraining from leaving the area, and not disturbing witnesses.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 14039 of 2023
Applicant :- Vijay Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Divyansh Rai Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Shailesh Kumar Tripathi
Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.
orZeku nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd fot; dh vksj ls eq0v0la0 389 lu 2022] vUrxZr /kkjk 363] 366] 376 Hkk0na0fo0 ,oa 3@4 ikDlks ,sDV] Fkkuk dksikxat] ftyk em esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA
vkosnd dh fo}ku vf/koDrk] ifjoknh ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd vkosnd dks bl izdj.k esa xyr ,oa QthZ rjhds ls >wBk QWlk;k x;k gS] mlus dfFkr vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k gS] ihfM+rk us vius /kkjk 164 na0iz0la0 ds c;ku esa dgk gS fd mlds xkao esa fot; dh ufugky gS ogha ls tku igpku gqbZ ge nksuksa I;kj djrs Fks] mlds ?kj okyksa us fot; dks ihfM+rk ls ckrsa djrs ns[k fy;k Fkk ?kj okys fot; ls 'kknh ugha dj jgs Fks] fn0 11&9&22 dks mlus fot; dks Qksu djds em cqyk;k vkSj mlds lkFk viuh ethZ ls fnYyh pyh x;h] nksuksa us 'kknh dj fy;k] bl izdkj og ,d lger i{kdkj Fkh] vkosnd funksZ"k gS rFkk og bl izdj.k esa fn0 30&11&2022 ls dkjkxkj es a fu:) gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A
ifjoknh ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us vkosnd ds tekur dk izcy fojks/k djrs gq, rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd vkosnd@vfHk;qDr }kjk dkfjr vijk/k laKs; ,oa xEHkhj izd`fr dk gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij u NksM+k tk;A
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ ds ifjizs{; esa i=koyh ij miyC/k lkjoku rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dk lexz :i ls voyksdu djus ds ckn] lcwrksa dh izd`fr vkSj fdlh Hkh Bksl fojks/kkRed lkexzh dh vuqifLFkfr ,oa miyC/k lkexzh ls NsM+NkM+ dh laHkkouk u gksus ds rF; dks ns[krs gq, esjh jk; esa vkosnd dks tekur ij eqDr djus dk mi;qDr vk/kkj gSA
vr% okn ds xq.k nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fVIi.kh fd, gq, vkosnd dks mijksDr of.kZr vijk/k esa lacaf/kr U;k;ky; dh lUrqf"V ij O;fDrxr ca/k&i= ,oa vf/kd /kujkf’k ds nks LFkkuh; izfrHkw izLrqr djus ij fuEufyf[kr 'krksZ ds lkFk tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A
3& vkosnd U;k;ky; ds vkns’kksa dk ikyu djsxk] og ijh{k.k ds nkSjku fcuk dksbZ vuko’;d LFkxu fy, fu;r frfFk ij U;k;ky; esa mifLFkr gksxk rFkk ijh{k.k esa bZekunkjh ls lg;ksx djsxkA
4& vkosnd tekur ij fjgk gksus ds ckn tekur dh Lora=rk dk nq:i;ksx ugha djsxk vkSj fdlh Hkh vijkf/kd xfrfof/k esa fyIr ugha gksxk u dksbZ vijkf/kd d`R; djsxkA
5& vkosnd izR;{k ;k vizR;{k :i ls ekeys ds rF;ksa ls ifjfpr fdlh Hkh O;fDr ;k iqfyl vf/kdkfj;ksa dks dksbZ izyksHku ;k /kedh ugha nsxk u gh muls dksbZ ok;nk djsxk] ftlds dkj.k mUgsa U;k;ky; esa rF;ksa dks mtkxj djus ls fojr jguk iM+sA
mijksDr 'krksZ esa ls fdlh ds mYya?ku ds ekeys esa] ijh{k.k U;k;ky; vkosnd dh tekur fu;ekuqlkj jn~n djus dks Lora= gSA
fn0 % 21&4&2023
ds0lh0flag
Digitally signed by :- KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is eligible for bail under Section 436 CrPC given the absence of conspiracy, prior knowledge, and attempt to abscond.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vijay
State Of U.P.
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
