Anil v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
This order dismisses a bail application for want of prosecution since the applicant did not appear. As the status of the trial is unknown to the court, no substantive ruling on the merits is provided.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:137428
Court No. - 64
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 14025 of 2020
Applicant :- Anil Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Desh Ratan Chaudhary Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
- List has been revised.
- This case is listed peremptorily today.
- No one responds on behalf of the applicant, like on earlier date fixed.
- It is not known whether the trial has been concluded or not. Whether the applicant has been charge-sheeted or exonerated.
- This bail application is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 11.7.2023 Ruchi Agrahari
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Anil
Coram
Siddharth, J.
Ruchi Agrahari
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/14025/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court