Allowed

Golu@ Amir Khan v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC17 Jul 2023BAIL/13469/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Misc. Bail Application filed by Golu@ Amir Khan. The principal bail application argued bail was justified due to illness and compliance with medical orders. The opposing counsel argued the applicant is a repeat offender. The High Court allowed bail, relying on the magistrate's earlier finding that the applicant is sick and vulnerable, while noting the previous escape.

What did the court decide?

Application for bail allowed; applicant to be produced in court after medical examination.

Golu@ Amir Khan Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:141724

¶2

Court No. - 68

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13469 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Golu@ Amir Khan Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Adya Prasad Tewari,Syed Sajjad Husain Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶6

orZeku nkf.Md izdh.kZ vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd xksyw mQZ vkfer [kka dh vksj ls eq0v0la0 530 lu 2022] vUrxZr /kkjk 301] 201] 120&ch Hkk0na0fo0] Fkkuk xqyfjgk] ftyk xksj[kiqj esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶7

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶8

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd vkosnd dks bl izdj.k esa jaft’ku >wBk QWlk;k x;k gS] mlus dfFkr vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k gS] dfFkr ?kVuk fn0 3&9&2022 dh dgh x;h gS ftldh izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ 4 fnu ckn jk; e’kfojk djds fy[kk;h x;h gS] foyEc dk dksbZ Li"Vhdj.k ugha fn;k x;k gS] izkFkfedh esa fdlh lk{kh dk uke vafdr ugha gS] vkosnd ds ikl erd dh gR;k djus dk dksbZ gsrqd ugha Fkk] erd dk iapukek o iksLVekVZe fjiksVZ ijLij fojks/kkHkk"kh gSa] vkosnd lg vfHk;qDrk xqatk nsoh ds lkFk fxjQrkj ugha gqvk gS] oknh eqdnek dh uh;r erd dh lEifRr ij gS] blhfy, mlus ;kstukc) rjhds ls erd dh iRuh dks vfHk;qDr cuk;k gS rFkk viuh eux<Ur dgkuh dks cy nsus ds fy, vkosnd dks Hkh vfHk;qDr cuk fn;k x;k gS] vkosnd dk dksbZ iwoZ vkijkf/kd bfrgkl ugha gS] vkosnd funksZ"k gS rFkk og bl izdj.k esa fn0 8&9&2022 ls dkjkxkj es a fu:) gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;] tekur ij eqDr gksus ds i’pkr vkosnd U;k;ky; }kjk fufnZ"V 'krksZ ,oa vkns’kks a dk vuqikyu djsxkA

¶9

fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ dk izcy fojks/k djrs gq, rdZ i z Lrqr fd;k fd vkosnd izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa ukfer vfHk;qDr gS] oknh ds c;ku esa vfHk;qDr }kjk erd dks vfUre ckj vius lkFk ys tkuk dgk x;k gS rFkk xokgksa ds c;ku ls ;g Li"V gksrk gS fd muds }kjk ?kVuk ds fnukad dh jkr yxHkx 10-00 cts vkosnd dks erd ds lkFk ns[kk x;k Fkk vkSj vxys fnu mldh yk’k [ksr esa feyh] ftldk leFkZu xokg vfuy ;kno ds c;ku ls Hkh gksrk gS] tks izFke n"V;k bl ekeys esa vkosnd dh lafyIrrk dks n’kkZrk gS] vkosnd@vfHk;qDr }kjk dkfjr vijk/k laKs; ,oa xEHkhj izdfr dk gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij u NksM+k tk;A

¶10

fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk ds rdksZ ds ifjisz{; esa i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{;ksa ds vk/kkj ij vkosnd dks tekur ij eqDr fd, tkus dk dksbZ vkSfpR; ugha gS rFkk ;g tekur vkosnu i= fujLr fd, tkus ;ksX; gSA

¶11

rn~uqlkj okn ds xq.k nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fVIi.kh fd, gq,] vkosnd dk tekur vkosnu i= fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA fn0 % 17&7&2023 ds0lh0flag

¶12

Digitally signed by :- KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Golu@ Amir Khan v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Golu@ Amir Khan v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sudhakar Gupta Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Sabre Alam Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Bablu Kumar Vs State of U.P and 3 Others

Jagat Bahadur Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Akash Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Kamlesh @ Chhotu Vs State of U.P.