Allowed

Rustam v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC23 Aug 2023BAIL/1319/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court granted bail to the applicant who faced charges of false attempt to murder and dishonestly causing grievous hurt. The judge observed the applicant released no victim even mentally, has no prior criminal record, and should be released on bail.

What did the court decide?

The applicant was released on bail subject to surrendering if summoned or to be committed for trial, not interfering with witnesses, and obeying all directions.

Rustam Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:170165

¶2

Court No. - 68

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1319 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Rustam Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Rajeev Tiwari,Swati Agrawal Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶6

orZeku nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd :Lre dh vksj ls eq0v0la0 0570 lu 2022] vUrxZr /kkjk 363] 506] 376&3 Hkk0na0fo0 ,oa 5@6 ikDlks ,sDV] Fkkuk flgkuh xsV] ftyk xkft;kckn esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶7

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk] ifjoknh ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶8

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd vkosnd dks bl izdj.k esa xyr ,oa QthZ rjhds ls >wBk QWlk;k x;k gS] mlus dfFkr vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k gS] oknh eqdnek dh iq=h dks vkosnd cgyk&Qqlyk dj ugha ys x;k vkSj u gh mlds lkFk dksbZ xyr dk;Z fd;k gS] oknh us >wBk eqdnek iathd`r djk;k gS] vkosnd rFkk ihfM+rk ,d nwljs dk dkQh le; ls tkurs gSa rFkk os vkil esa vPNs nksLr gSa rFkk eksckbZy ds tfj;s ,d nwljs ls ckrphr ,oa OgkVl,V pSV Hkh djrs gSa] vkosnd ,oa ihfM+rk ds ,d lkFk esa vufxur QksVksxzkQ gSa rFkk nksuksa dk ,d lkFk dkQh ?kweuk fQjuk Fkk] ihfM+rk us viuk vkUrfjd ,oa ckg; fpfdRlh; ijh{k.k djkus ls euk fd;k gS] tks fd /kkjk 164&, na0 iz0 la0 dk mYya?ku gSA vkosnd funksZ"k gS rFkk og bl izdj.k esa 13&9&2022 ls dkjkxkj es a fu:) gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A

¶9

fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ dk izcy fojks/k djrs gq, rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd vkosnd }kjk dkfjr vijk/k laKs; ,oa xEHkhj izd`fr dk gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij u NksM+k tk;A

¶10

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ ds ifjizs{; esa i=koyh ij miyC/k lkjoku rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dk lexz :i ls voyksdu djus ds ckn] lcwrksa dh izd`fr vkSj fdlh Hkh Bksl fojks/kkRed lkexzh dh vuqifLFkfr ,oa miyC/k lkexzh ls NsM+NkM+ dh laHkkouk u gksus ds rF; dks ns[krs gq, esjh jk; esa vkosnd dks tekur ij eqDr djus dk mi;qDr vk/kkj gSA

¶11

vr% okn ds xq.k nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fVIi.kh fd, gq, vkosnd dks mijksDr of.kZr vijk/k esa lacaf/kr U;k;ky; dh lUrqf"V ij O;fDrxr ca/k&i= ,oa vf/kd /kujkf’k ds nks LFkkuh; izfrHkw izLrqr djus ij fuEufyf[kr 'krksZ ds lkFk tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A

¶12

1& vkosnd foospuk ;k ijh{k.k ds nkSjku vfHk;kstu lk{;ksa ds lkFk NsM + NkM+ ugha djsxkA

¶13

2& vkosnd vfHk;kstu lkf{k;ksa o ihfM+r@f’kdk;rdrkZ dks Mjk;sxk@/kedk;sxk ughaA

¶14

3& vkosnd U;k;ky; ds vkns’kksa dk ikyu djsxk] og ijh{k.k ds nkSjku fcuk dksbZ vuko’;d LFkxu

¶15

fy, fu;r frfFk ij U;k;ky; esa mifLFkr gksxk rFkk ijh{k.k esa bZekunkjh ls lg;ksx djsxkA

¶16

4& vkosnd tekur ij fjgk gksus ds ckn tekur dh Lora=rk dk nq:i;ksx ugha djsxk vkSj fdlh Hkh

¶17

vijkf/kd xfrfof/k esa fyIr ugha gksxk u dksbZ vijkf/kd d`R; djsxkA

¶18

5& vkosnd izR;{k ;k vizR;{k :i ls ekeys ds rF;ksa ls ifjfpr fdlh Hkh O;fDr ;k iqfyl vf/kdkfj;ksa dks dksbZ izyksHku ;k /kedh ugha nsxk u gh muls dksbZ ok;nk djsxk] ftlds dkj.k mUgsa U;k;ky; esa rF;ksa dks mtkxj djus ls fojr jguk iM+sA

¶19

mijksDr 'krksZ esa ls fdlh ds mYya?ku ds ekeys esa] ijh{k.k U;k;ky; vkosnd dh tekur fu;ekuqlkj jn~n djus dks Lora= gSA

fn0 % 23&8&2023

ds0lh0flag

2 of 2

Digitally signed by :- KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Rustam v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rustam v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Surjeet Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Ramkeval Vs State of U.P.

Hari Singh Vs State of U.P.

Rehan Vs State of U.P.

Deepak Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Tula Ram Vs State of U.P. and Another