Allowed

Ramnaresh v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC28 Mar 2023BAIL/12489/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application under Section 439 CrPC, the single-judge High Court of Allahabad enlarged Raghu Misra (applicant) who had been in jail since September 2022. The applicant, in connection with a dowry death suicide case, pleaded innocence and old age, assuring cooperation. The court satisfied itself of the lack of tampering risk and allowed bail on personal bond and two heavy sureties with spe

What did the court decide?

Release of applicant on bail by furnishing personal bond and two heavy sureties with specific conditions regarding court attendance and non-tampering.

Ramnaresh Vs State of U.P. — Matrimonial and Divorce | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Court No. - 78

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12489 of 2023

¶3

Applicant :- Ramnaresh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Raghuvansh Misra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Mukesh Kumar

¶4

Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Raghuvansh Misra, learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the State, Sri Mukesh Kumar, learned counsel for the first informant and perused the material on record.

¶6

This bail application under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the applicant Ramnaresh, seeking enlargement on bail during trial in connection with Case Crime No. 402 of 2022, under sections 498-A, 304-B IPC and section 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S. Bhogaon, District Mainpuri.

¶7

The submission advanced by learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. The applicant is father-in-law of the deceased. The uncle of the deceased and father-in-law of the deceased were made the witnesses of the inquest report. There are general allegation of demand of dowry and subjecting the deceased to cruelty has been made against the applicant. According to post mortem examination report there is ligature mark and hyoid bone was found intact. It is a case of suicide. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused have also been mentioned. It has also been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required and is also ready to accept all the conditions which the Court may deem fit to impose upon him. It is further contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is old aged person languishing in jail since 18.09.2022 having no criminal history.

¶8

Per contra, learned AGA for the State and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer for bail and has stated that the marriage of the deceased was solemnized within eight months of

¶9

her marriage.

¶10

After perusing the record in the light of the submissions made at the bar and after taking an overall view of all the facts and circumstances of this case, the nature of evidence and also the absence of any convincing material to indicate the possibility of tampering with the evidence, this Court is of the view that the applicant may be enlarged on bail.

¶11

Let the applicant- Ramnaresh, be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:-

¶12

i) The applicant will not tamper with prosecution evidence and will not harm or harass the victim/complainant in any manner whatsoever.

¶13

ii) The applicant will abide the orders of court, will attend the court on every date and will not delay the disposal of trial in any manner whatsoever.

¶14

(iii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the date fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶15

(iv) The applicant will not misuse the liberty of bail in any manner whatsoever. In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under section 82 Cr.P.C., may be issued and if applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under section 174-A I.P.C.

¶16

(V) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on dates fixed for (1) opening of the case, (2) framing of charge and (3) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law and the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A IPC.

¶17

(vi) The trial court may make all possible efforts/endeavour and try to conclude the trial expeditiously after the release of the applicant.

¶18

The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by court concerned and in case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, court concerned will be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison.

¶19

The bail application is allowed .

¶20

Order Date :- 28.3.2023

¶21

RPD

¶22

Digitally signed by :- RATAN PRAKASH DWIVEDI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ramnaresh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramnaresh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunil Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Naseem @ Mamu Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Lalit Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Ashish Kumar Pandey Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Pradeep Vishwakarma Vs State of U.P.

Rahul Chauhan Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others