In a criminal miscellaneous bail application, the Allahabad High Court allowed the bail of the applicant, a mother-in-law in custody since 2017, allowing her release subject to personal bond and sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:135069
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12347 of 2021
Applicant :- Bhoop Devi@ Bhoop Dayee Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Subhash Chandra Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
record of the case.
(i) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the dates fixed, unless her personal presence is exempted.
(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal and anti-social activity.
Order Date :- 7.7.2023/Ankita
Digitally signed by :- ANKITA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to release on bail having been incarcerated since 2017 and after serving more than half of the minimum punishment for Section 304B IPC.
Whether a second bail application should be considered despite the earlier application being dismissed on merit.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Bhoop Devi@ Bhoop Dayee
State of U.P.
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
