In a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the Court allowed the release of the applicant. The Court noted the belated filing of the FIR, late arrest, default bail grounds, and parity with co-accused, finding no reasonable apprehension of tampering or witness intimidation.
Release on bail by furnishing personal bond and two sureties in the like amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:178086
Court No. - 74
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12280 of 2023
Applicant :- Gireesh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ravinath Tiwari,Amrita Kashyap,Sujeet Kumar Sonkar,Yadvendra Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record.
(i) shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court;
(iii) shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses.
Order Date :- 14.9.2023 Lbm/-
Digitally signed by :- LAL BAHADUR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail given the delayed lodging of the FIR and belated arrest.
Whether parity exists with co-accused granted bail in similar proceedings.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gireesh
State of U.P.
Vivek Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
