The court allowed the bail application filed by the applicant for offenses under Sections 307 and 504 IPC, holding that he made out a case for bail.
Release of applicant on personal bond and two sureties (one a family member) subject to conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:110552
Court No. - 86
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11557 of 2023
Applicant :- Akhilesh Yadav @ Akkal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Yadav,Sr. Advocate,Vijay Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Arvind Kumar Rai
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
i. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by
intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.
ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.
iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
Order Date :- 18.5.2023 Dev/-
Digitally signed by :- DEV PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail being acquitted of charges of attempt to murder and criminal intimidation.
Whether the delay in FIR and nature of offence permits the release of the applicant on bail.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. C.B.I. & Another, passed in S.L.P.(Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021Referred¶10
Akhilesh Yadav @ Akkal
Vivek Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
