Kallu v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a bail application where the High Court granted bail to the applicant. The court found the allegation of complicity unproven and ordered that no revenge or intimidation be taken against the applicant.
What did the court decide?
Bail granted on condition of no intimidation, non-interference with witnesses/victims, and strict compliance with court orders, with cross-conditions in the bail bond.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:107632
Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11127 of 2023
Applicant :- Kallu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ali Hasan,Istiyaq Ali Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.
orZeku nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd dYyw dh vksj ls eq0v0la0 208 lu 2022] vUrxZr /kkjk 326&,] 506 Hkk0na0fo0] Fkkuk 'kkgxat] ftyk vkxjk esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu
fd;kA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd vkosnd dks bl izdj.k esa xyr ,oa QthZ rjhds ls >wBk QWlk;k x;k gS] mlus dfFkr vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k gS] vkosnd us fdlh dks Hkh tku ls ekjus dh /kedh ugha nh vkSj u gh fdlh ds mij rstkc Qsadk gS] vkosnd ds ?kj o njokts ls dksbZ rstkc ;k dfV~V;k cjken ugha gq;h gS] ?kVuk jkr dh crk;h tk jgh gS] fdlh vU; us rstkc Qsadus dh ?kVuk dks vatke fn;k gS] vkosnd dks rstkc Qsadrs gq, fdlh us ugha ns[kk gS] vkosnd funksZ"k gS rFkk og bl izdj.k esa 10&5&2022 ls dkjkxkj es a fu:) gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail to be granted to applicant accused in a criminal trial.
Whether conditions for bail can be framed considering absence of specific complicity evidence.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Kallu
Coram
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/11127/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court